Challenging the Validity of a Texas Warrant: Legal Options

When it comes to protecting one’s rights in Texas, understanding the details of how warrants work is essential. A warrant is an official document issued by a judge or magistrate that allows law enforcement to search a property, make an arrest, or seize property under certain conditions. These orders are intended to ensure that law enforcement acts within legal boundaries, yet not all warrants are valid. Sometimes, a warrant may have been obtained improperly or contain errors that could make it invalid. In such cases, it is possible to challenge the warrant’s validity. Doing so, however, requires understanding the types of warrants, how they are issued, and the legal grounds on which one may contest them. At, Deandra Grant Law, we are here to guide you through the legal process and help you navigate the complexities of your case.

Firm Accolades

DUIDLA-BadAss-Award

Understanding the Basics of Warrants in Texas

In Texas, there are different types of warrants, each with its own purpose and rules. The most common types include arrest warrants, search warrants, and bench warrants. An arrest warrant gives police the authority to arrest an individual suspected of a crime. A search warrant allows law enforcement to search a specific location for evidence related to a criminal investigation. A bench warrant, issued by a judge, usually arises when someone fails to appear in court for a scheduled hearing. Each of these warrants must follow a specific legal process, including approval by a judge or magistrate who believes there is probable cause or a legitimate reason for the warrant.

To be valid, a warrant must include certain details such as the name of the person involved, the specific items to be searched or seized, and a statement of probable cause. Probable cause means there is a reasonable basis to believe that a crime has occurred and that evidence related to the crime may be found at the location specified. The Fourth Amendment of the United States Constitution protects against unreasonable searches and seizures, making it vital for warrants to meet all legal requirements. When a warrant does not fulfill these requirements, it can be challenged in court.

Attorney Deandra Grant

Deandra M. Grant

Managing Partner

Douglas E. Huff

Partner & Criminal Division Chief

Johnny Lanzillo

Criminal Division Senior Associate

Makenzie Zarate

Criminal Division DWI Trial Chief

Texas Attorney Kevin Sheneberger

Kevin Sheneberger

Criminal Division Associate

Common Grounds for Challenging a Warrant’s Validity

Challenging the validity of a warrant in Texas involves proving that something about the warrant was unlawful or incorrect. There are several main reasons a person might argue that a warrant is invalid. One common ground is the lack of probable cause. If the police officer or detective who requested the warrant did not have enough evidence to justify the search or arrest, then the warrant may be considered unlawful. A judge must review the evidence to decide if it is enough to support probable cause, but sometimes errors occur, and warrants are issued without sufficient cause.

Another reason to challenge a warrant is based on inaccuracies or mistakes in the document. For example, if a search warrant does not correctly describe the location or the items to be seized, it might be invalid. In some cases, warrants are too broad, meaning they allow for the seizure of items that may not be related to the investigation. Such “general warrants” go against the Fourth Amendment, which requires that warrants be specific. Mistakes in the name or address of the person being searched can also render a warrant invalid, as the wrong person or location might be targeted without just cause.

A third common ground for challenging a warrant is misconduct by law enforcement. If the police officers who obtained the warrant did so by using false information or by hiding important facts, this is known as “misrepresentation.” Providing inaccurate information to a judge to secure a warrant is illegal, and any warrant obtained in this way may be challenged and possibly invalidated in court. Lastly, if the officers who executed the warrant went beyond the warrant’s scope by seizing items or searching areas not listed, this could also make the warrant invalid.

How the Exclusionary Rule Applies to Invalid Warrants

The exclusionary rule is a legal principle that prevents evidence obtained through an invalid warrant from being used in court. In Texas, as in other states, if a court finds that a warrant was issued or executed improperly, the evidence collected during the search may not be admissible in a trial. This rule is based on the idea that individuals have a right to privacy, and any evidence obtained through a violation of this right cannot be used against them. For example, if law enforcement searches someone’s home with a flawed warrant and finds evidence of a crime, that evidence might be excluded if the warrant’s validity is successfully challenged.

The exclusionary rule serves as a deterrent against unlawful search and seizure practices. It encourages law enforcement to ensure that they are following correct procedures when seeking warrants. However, there are exceptions to this rule, including the “good faith” exception. If the officers executing the warrant genuinely believed it was valid and were not aware of any flaws, a court may still allow the evidence. Despite this exception, the exclusionary rule remains a powerful tool in protecting constitutional rights.

"Deandra Grant Law handled my case with diligence and professionalism. Deandra Grant's reputation is stellar and now I know why. She has a team of individuals who provide quality service."

- N. Coulter

"Deandra Grant Law fights hard for their clients and is always willing to go above and beyond. They are the best firm for DWI cases in DFW and beyond. Definitely hire them to represent you in any pending cases."

- P. Williams

"Deandra Grant made a tough situation so much better. She listened to my concerns and helped me so much with my case. I would recommend her to anyone needing legal services."

- M. Haley

Legal Options for Challenging a Warrant in Texas

If someone believes a warrant issued against them is invalid, they have the right to challenge it in court. In Texas, this challenge typically occurs through a “motion to suppress,” a formal request asking the court to exclude evidence gathered through the warrant. This motion must be filed with the court handling the criminal case, and it must outline why the warrant is invalid. For example, a person could argue that the warrant was issued without probable cause or that it was based on incorrect information.

Once a motion to suppress is filed, a hearing is usually scheduled where both the defense and the prosecution can present their arguments. The defense may provide evidence showing that law enforcement did not follow proper procedures when obtaining or executing the warrant. Witnesses, including police officers, may be called to testify about how the warrant was obtained. The judge then decides if the warrant was indeed invalid, and if so, the evidence may be excluded from the trial.

An attorney can also examine the details of how the warrant was served. If law enforcement officers entered a property without announcing their presence or did not follow other protocol, this could be grounds to challenge the warrant’s validity. In cases involving highly sensitive evidence, a defense lawyer might also negotiate with the prosecution to exclude evidence, even if the warrant itself is not entirely invalid. This approach can be helpful in cases where the legality of the warrant is questionable, but the defense wishes to avoid a lengthy legal battle.

Related Videos

Judge or Jury Trial?

Choosing a Criminal Defense Attorney

The Role of an Attorney in Challenging Warrants

Navigating the legal system can be complex, especially when it comes to challenging the validity of a warrant. An attorney who understands Texas law can evaluate the specific circumstances of the case and identify possible grounds for challenging the warrant. Attorneys have access to legal resources and understand how to file and argue motions to suppress, increasing the chances of successfully contesting an invalid warrant. They can investigate the actions of law enforcement, gather evidence, and ensure that the person’s rights are protected throughout the legal process.

Attorneys can also help clients understand the potential outcomes of challenging a warrant. In some cases, even if a warrant is declared invalid, the prosecution may have other evidence that can still be used. In others, excluding key evidence might weaken the prosecution’s case enough to lead to dropped charges. By working with an attorney, individuals facing criminal charges can make informed decisions and feel confident that their rights are defended at every stage.

The Importance of Acting Quickly When Challenging a Warrant

Challenging a warrant requires taking swift action. When faced with a warrant, the person involved should reach out to an attorney as soon as possible. Legal deadlines may affect the case, and any delay in challenging the warrant could impact the success of the defense. By consulting with a lawyer early, the individual allows time for a thorough review of the warrant and an investigation into the facts surrounding its issuance.

Acting quickly is especially important if the warrant involves the potential loss of personal property or other consequences. An attorney can advise on how best to respond, including filing motions to prevent the loss or seizure of property until the validity of the warrant is reviewed. This timely intervention can make a significant difference in the outcome of the case, allowing the person to protect their rights and property.

Case Results

Not Guilty

.17 Alcohol Level Was Reported

Case Dismissed

Arrested for DWI

Thrown Breath Score Out

.17 Breath Test

Case Dismissed

Assault Causing Bodily Injury of a Family Member

Case Dismissed

Possession of a Controlled Substance, Penalty Group 3, under 28 grams

Trial – Not Guilty

Continuous Sexual Abuse of A Child

Case Dismissed

Driving While Intoxicated With a Blood Alcohol =0.15

Trial – Not Guilty

Violation of Civil Commitment

Dismissed-Motion to Suppress Evidence Granted

Driving While Intoxicated

Dismissed-No Billed by Grand Jury

Assault Causing Bodily Injury of a Family Member with Prior

Case Results

Not Guilty

.17 Alcohol Level Was Reported

Case Dismissed

Arrested for DWI

Thrown Breath Score Out

.17 Breath Test

Case Dismissed

Assault Causing Bodily Injury of a Family Member

Case Dismissed

Possession of a Controlled Substance, Penalty Group 3, under 28 grams

Trial – Not Guilty

Continuous Sexual Abuse of A Child

Case Dismissed

Driving While Intoxicated With a Blood Alcohol =0.15

Trial – Not Guilty

Violation of Civil Commitment

Dismissed-Motion to Suppress Evidence Granted

Driving While Intoxicated

Dismissed-No Billed by Grand Jury

Assault Causing Bodily Injury of a Family Member with Prior

If you are facing legal challenges related to a warrant in Texas and believe the warrant may be invalid, seeking assistance is essential. Challenging a warrant can be a complicated process, but it is possible with the right support. Deandra Grant Law can provide the guidance you need to navigate this situation. Our team is here to help you understand your rights, evaluate the warrant’s validity, and take action to protect your freedom and future. Reach out to us today to discuss your case and explore your legal options. We are dedicated to standing by your side throughout every step of the process.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *