Common Defenses Used in Texas BWI Cases and Their Effectiveness

In Texas, Boating While Intoxicated (BWI) cases are treated with the same seriousness as driving while intoxicated (DWI) charges. The state’s strict laws around operating watercraft under the influence of alcohol or drugs make it essential for those accused to mount an effective defense. A BWI conviction can lead to penalties that may include hefty fines, jail time, and the suspension of boating privileges. However, many defenses can be raised to challenge these charges. Understanding the most common defenses used in Texas BWI cases and their effectiveness is critical for anyone facing such accusations. Deandra Grant Law provides dedicated support and strategic guidance for individuals facing BWI cases, ensuring their rights are protected throughout the legal process.

Firm Accolades

DUIDLA-BadAss-Award

Challenging the Legality of the Stop

One of the most commonly used defenses in BWI cases is challenging the legality of the stop or the boarding of the boat. Under Texas law, law enforcement must have a valid reason to stop or board a boat. Unlike road traffic laws where probable cause is necessary to pull over a vehicle, the rules governing watercraft are slightly more relaxed. Officers on the water are generally allowed to conduct safety checks without suspicion of intoxication, which includes ensuring that the vessel is properly equipped with life jackets, fire extinguishers, and other safety equipment. However, if an officer extends a routine safety check into a full investigation without probable cause or reasonable suspicion of intoxication, this can be grounds for challenging the stop. If a defense attorney can demonstrate that the stop was unlawful, it may lead to the suppression of any evidence gathered after the stop, significantly weakening the prosecution’s case.

The effectiveness of this defense often depends on the circumstances of the stop and the officer’s actions. In cases where the officer had little to no justification for extending a routine safety inspection into a sobriety check, this defense can be very successful. On the other hand, if the officer observed behavior that suggested intoxication, such as erratic boat operation or open containers of alcohol, the likelihood of this defense succeeding diminishes.

Challenging the Field Sobriety Tests

Field sobriety tests are often used in BWI cases to determine whether a boater is intoxicated. However, the effectiveness of these tests is highly questionable when performed on the water. Standardized field sobriety tests such as the walk-and-turn, the one-leg stand, and the horizontal gaze nystagmus test were designed for use on solid, flat ground. Attempting to perform these tests on the unstable surface of a boat can be challenging even for someone who is completely sober. Factors such as the motion of the water, weather conditions, and the boater’s natural fatigue from a day of boating can all affect the test results.

Attorney Deandra Grant

Deandra M. Grant

Managing Partner

Douglas E. Huff

Partner & Criminal Division Chief

Johnny Lanzillo

Criminal Division Senior Associate

Makenzie Zarate

Criminal Division DWI Trial Chief

Texas Attorney Kevin Sheneberger

Kevin Sheneberger

Criminal Division Associate

Because of these factors, challenging the accuracy and reliability of field sobriety tests is a common defense in BWI cases. A skilled defense attorney may argue that the conditions under which the tests were administered made it impossible to obtain accurate results. The courts often consider the context in which the tests were performed, making this a potentially effective defense in many BWI cases. If the court agrees that the tests were unreliable, the results may be thrown out, weakening the prosecution’s case.

Questioning the Accuracy of Breathalyzer or Blood Tests

In BWI cases, just like in DWI cases, law enforcement may rely on breathalyzer or blood test results to establish a person’s blood alcohol concentration (BAC). Texas law sets a legal limit of 0.08% BAC for operating a watercraft. However, there are several ways to challenge the accuracy of these tests. Breathalyzers can produce inaccurate results due to improper calibration, mechanical issues, or improper administration of the test. Similarly, blood tests can be compromised by contamination, improper storage, or errors in the chain of custody.

One effective defense strategy is to question the handling of the breath or blood samples. A defense attorney may investigate whether the testing equipment was properly maintained or whether the samples were mishandled at any point. Even a small mistake in the testing process can cast doubt on the accuracy of the BAC results. If the defense can raise reasonable doubts about the reliability of the test results, it may lead to the suppression of this critical evidence, which can significantly impact the outcome of the case.

Medical Conditions and Alternative Explanations for Intoxication

Another defense that may be used in Texas BWI cases is that the defendant’s behavior or BAC results were influenced by a medical condition or other factors unrelated to alcohol consumption. Certain medical conditions, such as diabetes or acid reflux, can cause breathalyzer results to be inaccurately high. Additionally, fatigue, sun exposure, and dehydration—common conditions experienced while boating—can mimic the signs of intoxication, such as dizziness, confusion, or lack of coordination.

In these cases, a defense attorney may introduce evidence of the defendant’s medical condition or argue that environmental factors contributed to their behavior. This defense can be particularly effective when combined with other strategies, such as questioning the reliability of field sobriety tests or challenging the accuracy of BAC results. If the defense can present a plausible alternative explanation for the defendant’s behavior, it may raise enough doubt to prevent a conviction.

"Deandra Grant Law handled my case with diligence and professionalism. Deandra Grant's reputation is stellar and now I know why. She has a team of individuals who provide quality service."

- N. Coulter

"Deandra Grant Law fights hard for their clients and is always willing to go above and beyond. They are the best firm for DWI cases in DFW and beyond. Definitely hire them to represent you in any pending cases."

- P. Williams

"Deandra Grant made a tough situation so much better. She listened to my concerns and helped me so much with my case. I would recommend her to anyone needing legal services."

- M. Haley

Lack of Evidence or Insufficient Proof

In any criminal case, the prosecution has the burden of proving guilt beyond a reasonable doubt. In BWI cases, this means the state must provide sufficient evidence that the defendant was operating a watercraft while intoxicated. If the prosecution’s case is weak or relies on circumstantial evidence, a defense attorney may argue that there is insufficient proof to support a conviction.

For example, the prosecution may rely heavily on the observations of the arresting officer, who might claim that the defendant appeared intoxicated based on slurred speech or erratic behavior. However, without solid evidence such as reliable BAC test results, the defense can argue that the officer’s observations are subjective and not enough to prove intoxication beyond a reasonable doubt. This defense can be effective in cases where the evidence is largely circumstantial or where key pieces of evidence, such as BAC test results, have been successfully challenged or suppressed.

Case Results

Not Guilty

.17 Alcohol Level Was Reported

Case Dismissed

Arrested for DWI

Thrown Breath Score Out

.17 Breath Test

Case Dismissed

Assault Causing Bodily Injury of a Family Member

Case Dismissed

Possession of a Controlled Substance, Penalty Group 3, under 28 grams

Trial – Not Guilty

Continuous Sexual Abuse of A Child

Case Dismissed

Driving While Intoxicated With a Blood Alcohol =0.15

Trial – Not Guilty

Violation of Civil Commitment

Dismissed-Motion to Suppress Evidence Granted

Driving While Intoxicated

Dismissed-No Billed by Grand Jury

Assault Causing Bodily Injury of a Family Member with Prior

Case Results

Not Guilty

.17 Alcohol Level Was Reported

Case Dismissed

Arrested for DWI

Thrown Breath Score Out

.17 Breath Test

Case Dismissed

Assault Causing Bodily Injury of a Family Member

Case Dismissed

Possession of a Controlled Substance, Penalty Group 3, under 28 grams

Trial – Not Guilty

Continuous Sexual Abuse of A Child

Case Dismissed

Driving While Intoxicated With a Blood Alcohol =0.15

Trial – Not Guilty

Violation of Civil Commitment

Dismissed-Motion to Suppress Evidence Granted

Driving While Intoxicated

Dismissed-No Billed by Grand Jury

Assault Causing Bodily Injury of a Family Member with Prior

Questioning the Definition of “Operating” a Watercraft

A unique defense that may apply in some BWI cases is questioning whether the defendant was truly operating the watercraft. Texas law defines operating a boat or other watercraft as controlling or steering the vessel. However, in certain situations, the defendant may argue that they were not actively operating the boat at the time of their arrest. For example, if the boat was anchored, docked, or drifting and the defendant was not actively controlling it, they may contend that they were not “operating” the vessel in a legal sense.

This defense can be effective if there is ambiguity about whether the defendant was in control of the boat at the time of the incident. If the prosecution cannot establish that the defendant was operating the boat while intoxicated, it may be difficult to secure a conviction. This defense works best in situations where the facts of the case clearly support the argument that the defendant was not actively operating the watercraft.

Mistaken Identity or Witness Misidentification

In some BWI cases, particularly those involving larger vessels or multiple people on board, there may be confusion about who was actually operating the watercraft. If the arresting officer or witnesses did not clearly see the defendant steering the boat, the defense may argue that the wrong person was charged with BWI. Mistaken identity can also occur in situations where the boat was pulled over but there was no clear indication of who was at the helm at the time.

This defense relies on casting doubt about who was responsible for operating the boat. If the defense can show that the prosecution has failed to prove that the defendant was the individual in control of the watercraft, it can lead to a favorable outcome for the accused. In cases where there is a lack of reliable witness testimony or conflicting accounts of the incident, this defense can be particularly effective.

Facing a Boating While Intoxicated charge in Texas is a serious matter that requires a thorough and well-planned defense. Each BWI case is unique, and the effectiveness of any given defense depends on the specific facts and circumstances involved. From challenging the legality of the stop to questioning the accuracy of sobriety tests or raising alternative explanations for the defendant’s behavior, there are many potential strategies that can be employed to fight these charges. A skilled defense attorney will carefully evaluate the evidence and craft a defense that is tailored to the specifics of the case, maximizing the chances of a favorable outcome.

If you or someone you know is facing BWI charges in Texas, it is crucial to seek legal assistance from an experienced and knowledgeable legal team. Deandra Grant Law is dedicated to providing compassionate and aggressive defense for individuals charged with BWI, DWI, and other related offenses. Our team understands the complexities of BWI cases and will work tirelessly to protect your rights and secure the best possible outcome. Contact Deandra Grant Law today for a consultation and take the first step toward defending your future.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *