Understanding the Process of Testing for Drugged Driving

Drugged driving has become an increasingly prominent concern for law enforcement agencies. As the landscape of drug use changes, especially with the legalization of marijuana in various states and the prevalence of prescription medications, ensuring road safety requires rigorous and accurate testing methods. Law enforcement officers are trained to detect and address drugged driving to protect all road users. This comprehensive guide will delve into how law enforcement tests for drugged driving, providing an in-depth look at the procedures, tools, and implications involved.

Firm Accolades

DUIDLA-BadAss-Award

The Initial Traffic Stop and Observation

The process of testing for drugged driving begins with the initial traffic stop. Law enforcement officers are trained to recognize the signs of impaired driving, which can include erratic driving patterns such as swerving, speeding, or driving significantly below the speed limit. Once a vehicle is stopped, the officer will engage with the driver to observe any physical signs of impairment. This may include bloodshot eyes, slurred speech, or the odor of drugs. The officer’s observations during this interaction are crucial as they form the basis for determining whether further testing is warranted.

Field Sobriety Tests (FSTs)

If an officer suspects drug impairment, they will likely administer a series of standardized Field Sobriety Tests. These tests are designed to assess a driver’s physical and cognitive abilities, which can be impaired by drug use. The three most commonly used tests are the Horizontal Gaze Nystagmus test, the Walk and Turn test, and the One-Leg Stand test. During the Horizontal Gaze Nystagmus test, the officer will observe the driver’s eyes for involuntary jerking as they follow a moving object. The Walk and Turn test requires the driver to walk in a straight line, turn, and walk back, while the One-Leg Stand test involves balancing on one leg. These tests help officers identify signs of impairment, though they are not specific to drug use and can be influenced by various factors.

Attorney Deandra Grant

Deandra M. Grant

Managing Partner

Douglas E. Huff

Partner & Criminal Division Chief

Johnny Lanzillo

Criminal Division Senior Associate

Makenzie Zarate

Criminal Division DWI Trial Chief

Texas Attorney Kevin Sheneberger

Kevin Sheneberger

Criminal Division Associate

Drug Recognition Specialists (DREs)

In cases where drug impairment is suspected, law enforcement may call upon a Drug Recognition Expert. DREs are officers who have received extensive training in identifying drug impairment. They follow a systematic and standardized 12-step evaluation process to determine if a driver is under the influence of drugs. This evaluation includes a preliminary breath test for alcohol, interviews with the arresting officer and the driver, a series of psychophysical tests, and an examination of the driver’s vital signs. The DRE will also observe the driver’s eyes and muscle tone, as certain drugs can cause specific physical reactions. Based on this comprehensive evaluation, the DRE can form an opinion on the type of drug involved, though laboratory tests are still needed for confirmation.

Chemical Testing: Blood, Urine, and Saliva Tests

To confirm drug use, law enforcement relies on chemical tests that analyze biological samples. Blood tests are considered the most accurate and can detect the presence of drugs and their metabolites. These tests are typically conducted at a medical facility and require a warrant unless the driver consents. Urine tests are also used, though they are less precise in determining impairment since they can only indicate past drug use. Saliva tests are becoming more common due to their non-invasive nature and ability to detect recent drug use. These tests can be administered roadside, providing timely results that help officers make informed decisions.

"Deandra Grant Law handled my case with diligence and professionalism. Deandra Grant's reputation is stellar and now I know why. She has a team of individuals who provide quality service."

- N. Coulter

"Deandra Grant Law fights hard for their clients and is always willing to go above and beyond. They are the best firm for DWI cases in DFW and beyond. Definitely hire them to represent you in any pending cases."

- P. Williams

"Deandra Grant made a tough situation so much better. She listened to my concerns and helped me so much with my case. I would recommend her to anyone needing legal services."

- M. Haley

The Role of Advanced Technology in Drug Testing

Advancements in technology have enhanced the ability of law enforcement to test for drugged driving. Devices such as roadside oral fluid testing kits allow officers to quickly screen for a variety of drugs, including marijuana, cocaine, opioids, and amphetamines. These devices provide preliminary results within minutes, aiding in the decision to conduct further testing. Additionally, breathalyzers specifically designed to detect THC, the psychoactive component of marijuana, are being developed. These innovations aim to provide more accurate and immediate assessments of drug impairment, improving the effectiveness of roadside testing.

Legal Implications and Challenges

The process of testing for drugged driving is not without its legal challenges. One significant issue is the lack of a standardized threshold for drug impairment, similar to the 0.08% blood alcohol concentration for alcohol-impaired driving. Different drugs affect individuals in various ways, making it difficult to establish a universal limit. Additionally, the presence of drugs in a driver’s system does not necessarily indicate impairment at the time of driving, especially with substances like marijuana, which can remain detectable for days or weeks. These complexities can complicate the legal process and require careful consideration in each case.

Related Videos

Judge or Jury Trial?

Choosing a Criminal Defense Attorney

Protecting Your Rights

If you are charged with drugged driving, it is crucial to understand your legal rights and options. The consequences of a conviction can be severe, including fines, license suspension, and even imprisonment. A skilled attorney can help navigate the complexities of the legal system, challenging the validity of the tests and the procedures followed by law enforcement. For instance, if the initial traffic stop lacked reasonable suspicion or if the chemical tests were improperly administered, these issues can form the basis for a defense. Additionally, an attorney can question the accuracy and reliability of the testing methods used, which is especially pertinent given the current limitations and variations in drug testing technology.

The Importance of a Comprehensive Defense Strategy

A robust defense strategy for drugged driving charges involves a thorough examination of all aspects of the case. This includes scrutinizing the training and credentials of the officers involved, the calibration and maintenance records of testing devices, and the chain of custody for biological samples. The witnesses may also be called upon to provide testimony on the effects of specific drugs and the reliability of the tests used. By building a comprehensive defense, an attorney can help protect your rights and work towards a favorable outcome.

Case Results

Not Guilty

.17 Alcohol Level Was Reported

Case Dismissed

Arrested for DWI

Thrown Breath Score Out

.17 Breath Test

Case Dismissed

Assault Causing Bodily Injury of a Family Member

Case Dismissed

Possession of a Controlled Substance, Penalty Group 3, under 28 grams

Trial – Not Guilty

Continuous Sexual Abuse of A Child

Case Dismissed

Driving While Intoxicated With a Blood Alcohol =0.15

Trial – Not Guilty

Violation of Civil Commitment

Dismissed-Motion to Suppress Evidence Granted

Driving While Intoxicated

Dismissed-No Billed by Grand Jury

Assault Causing Bodily Injury of a Family Member with Prior

Case Results

Not Guilty

.17 Alcohol Level Was Reported

Case Dismissed

Arrested for DWI

Thrown Breath Score Out

.17 Breath Test

Case Dismissed

Assault Causing Bodily Injury of a Family Member

Case Dismissed

Possession of a Controlled Substance, Penalty Group 3, under 28 grams

Trial – Not Guilty

Continuous Sexual Abuse of A Child

Case Dismissed

Driving While Intoxicated With a Blood Alcohol =0.15

Trial – Not Guilty

Violation of Civil Commitment

Dismissed-Motion to Suppress Evidence Granted

Driving While Intoxicated

Dismissed-No Billed by Grand Jury

Assault Causing Bodily Injury of a Family Member with Prior

Navigating the Future of Drugged Driving Enforcement

As drug use continues to evolve and new substances emerge, law enforcement agencies must adapt their methods for detecting and addressing drugged driving. Ongoing research and development in drug testing technology are essential to keep pace with these changes. Additionally, there is a need for standardized guidelines and thresholds for drug impairment to ensure consistent and fair enforcement. Public education and awareness campaigns can also play a vital role in preventing drugged driving, emphasizing the importance of making safe and responsible choices on the road.

If you or a loved one is facing charges for drugged driving, it is imperative to seek legal representation from a firm that understands the intricacies of these cases. Deandra Grant Law has extensive experience in defending clients against drugged driving charges, offering a comprehensive approach to protect your rights and achieve the best possible outcome. Our team is dedicated to thoroughly investigating each case, challenging the evidence presented, and providing a robust defense strategy tailored to your specific situation. Do not navigate this challenging time alone. Contact Deandra Grant Law today to schedule a consultation and take the first step towards securing your future. Our commitment to justice and our clients’ well-being is unwavering. Let us help you through this difficult process with the experience and dedication you deserve.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *