Intoxication assault is a serious criminal offense in Texas that can lead to severe penalties, including imprisonment, heavy fines, and the loss of driving privileges. It occurs when a person, while intoxicated, operates a motor vehicle, watercraft, or amusement ride, and by reason of that intoxication causes serious bodily injury to another person. The charge can be daunting, but there are defenses available that can potentially mitigate or even dismiss the charges. Understanding these defenses requires an in-depth exploration of the legal framework surrounding intoxication assault, the nature of the charges, and the specific circumstances of each case.
Firm Accolades
Understanding Intoxication Assault in Texas
In Texas, intoxication assault is classified as a third-degree felony, which carries severe consequences. A conviction can result in a prison sentence ranging from two to ten years, along with fines up to $10,000. Additionally, the convicted individual may face a suspension of their driver’s license and mandatory participation in alcohol education or treatment programs. The gravity of these penalties makes it crucial for anyone facing such charges to understand the nuances of the law and the defenses available.
Intoxication is broadly defined under Texas law as having a blood alcohol concentration (BAC) of 0.08 percent or higher, or not having the normal use of mental or physical faculties due to the consumption of alcohol, drugs, or a combination of both. Serious bodily injury, on the other hand, refers to an injury that creates a substantial risk of death or causes permanent disfigurement or protracted loss or impairment of the function of any bodily member or organ.
For the prosecution to secure a conviction for intoxication assault, they must prove beyond a reasonable doubt that the accused was intoxicated at the time of the accident, that this intoxication was the proximate cause of the accident, and that the accident resulted in serious bodily injury to another person. Given the complexity of these elements, several defenses can be raised depending on the specifics of the case.
Managing Partner Partner & Criminal Division Chief Criminal Division Senior Associate Criminal Division DWI Trial Chief Criminal Division Associate
Challenging the Evidence of Intoxication
One of the most common defenses in intoxication assault cases involves challenging the evidence of intoxication. The prosecution typically relies on breathalyzer or blood test results to establish that the defendant was intoxicated. However, these tests are not infallible and can be subject to various errors. For instance, breathalyzer machines must be properly calibrated and maintained, and the individual administering the test must be adequately trained. If there are any irregularities in the testing process or if the machine was not functioning correctly, the results may be challenged in court.
Moreover, the timing of the test is critical. The body continues to absorb alcohol after drinking, and a person’s BAC can rise even after they have stopped drinking. This means that a BAC test administered some time after the alleged offense might not accurately reflect the defendant’s BAC at the time of the accident. By scrutinizing the timing and administration of the test, it is possible to cast doubt on the accuracy of the results, thereby weakening the prosecution’s case.
Another aspect of challenging the evidence of intoxication involves questioning the observations of law enforcement officers. Officers often rely on field sobriety tests to assess whether a driver is intoxicated. However, these tests are highly subjective and can be influenced by a variety of factors unrelated to intoxication, such as fatigue, anxiety, medical conditions, or even the conditions under which the tests are administered. If the defense can demonstrate that the officer’s observations were unreliable or that the tests were conducted improperly, this can undermine the prosecution’s claim that the defendant was intoxicated.
Causation: Was Intoxication the Proximate Cause?
Even if it is established that the defendant was intoxicated, the prosecution must also prove that this intoxication was the proximate cause of the accident that resulted in serious bodily injury. This is a crucial element of the offense, and it provides another avenue for the defense.
The defense can argue that the accident was caused by factors other than the defendant’s intoxication. For example, the injured party may have been driving recklessly or may have engaged in sudden, unexpected maneuvers that made the collision unavoidable. Alternatively, road conditions, weather, or mechanical failures could have contributed to the accident. If it can be shown that the accident would have occurred regardless of the defendant’s intoxication, this can serve as a defense to the charge of intoxication assault.
"Deandra Grant Law handled my case with diligence and professionalism. Deandra Grant's reputation is stellar and now I know why. She has a team of individuals who provide quality service." "Deandra Grant Law fights hard for their clients and is always willing to go above and beyond. They are the best firm for DWI cases in DFW and beyond. Definitely hire them to represent you in any pending cases." "Deandra Grant made a tough situation so much better. She listened to my concerns and helped me so much with my case. I would recommend her to anyone needing legal services."
- N. Coulter
- P. Williams
- M. Haley
Establishing an alternative cause for the accident requires a thorough investigation of the circumstances surrounding the incident. This may involve consulting with accident reconstruction specialists, analyzing vehicle damage, and reviewing witness statements. By presenting a plausible alternative explanation for the accident, the defense can create reasonable doubt as to whether the defendant’s intoxication was the proximate cause, potentially leading to a dismissal or reduction of charges.
Questioning the Severity of the Injury
Another possible defense in an intoxication assault case is to challenge whether the injury sustained by the other party qualifies as “serious bodily injury” under Texas law. The definition of serious bodily injury is specific, and not all injuries meet the criteria. For example, an injury that is painful but does not result in a substantial risk of death, disfigurement, or prolonged impairment may not qualify as serious bodily injury.
In some cases, the defense may be able to obtain medical records or testimony to argue that the injury sustained by the victim does not meet the legal threshold for serious bodily injury. If successful, this defense could result in a reduction of the charges or even a dismissal of the case.
Judge or Jury Trial? Choosing a Criminal Defense AttorneyRelated Videos
Involuntary Intoxication Defense
In rare instances, a defendant may be able to argue that they were involuntarily intoxicated at the time of the offense. This defense applies when the defendant was unknowingly or unwillingly made intoxicated by the actions of another person. For example, if someone was drugged without their knowledge, or if they were forced to consume alcohol or drugs under duress, they may have a valid defense of involuntary intoxication.
The success of this defense depends heavily on the ability to provide credible evidence that the intoxication was indeed involuntary. If the defense can demonstrate that the defendant was not responsible for their intoxicated state, this could absolve them of liability for the offense.
Affirmative Defenses and Legal Justifications
In some situations, affirmative defenses or legal justifications may apply. Affirmative defenses acknowledge that the defendant committed the act in question but argue that there was a legal justification for it. One such defense is the doctrine of necessity, which could apply if the defendant was forced to drive while intoxicated in order to prevent a greater harm, such as escaping from a life-threatening situation.
The doctrine of necessity is a challenging defense to assert, as it requires proving that the harm avoided was greater than the harm caused by driving while intoxicated. Additionally, it must be shown that there were no reasonable alternatives available other than committing the offense. However, if successfully argued, this defense can lead to a complete acquittal.
Plea Bargaining and Alternative Sentencing Options
While not a defense per se, plea bargaining is a critical aspect of the legal strategy in intoxication assault cases. Depending on the strength of the prosecution’s evidence and the specifics of the case, it may be possible to negotiate a plea deal that reduces the charges or results in a more lenient sentence. For example, the defense may be able to negotiate a reduction of the charge to a lesser offense, such as driving while intoxicated (DWI), which carries less severe penalties.
In some cases, alternative sentencing options may also be available, particularly for first-time offenders. These options could include probation, participation in alcohol or drug treatment programs, or community service. By negotiating with the prosecution, the defense can often secure an outcome that minimizes the impact on the defendant’s life while still addressing the concerns of public safety.
Case Results
The Importance of Legal Representation
Given the complexities involved in defending against intoxication assault charges, it is crucial for defendants to seek legal representation from an attorney who is well-versed in Texas criminal law. An experienced attorney can evaluate the specific circumstances of the case, identify potential defenses, and develop a comprehensive legal strategy aimed at achieving the best possible outcome.
The consequences of an intoxication assault conviction are far-reaching and can impact every aspect of a person’s life, from their freedom and financial stability to their personal and professional relationships. With so much at stake, having a skilled attorney by your side is not just beneficial; it is essential.
If you or a loved one is facing intoxication assault charges in Texas, it is imperative to act swiftly and seek the assistance of a competent legal team. The complexities of such cases demand an attorney who can meticulously examine the evidence, challenge the prosecution’s assertions, and provide a robust defense tailored to the unique circumstances of your case. At Deandra Grant Law, our dedicated legal professionals are committed to protecting your rights and helping you navigate the legal system with confidence. Contact us today to discuss your case and learn how we can assist you in defending against these serious charges.